EVE Search - Miners of The Proveldtariat Rejoice!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Miners of The Proveldtariat Rejoice!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.09 17:27:00 - [1] - Quote why does anyone bother to argue with pipa porto? Its like arguing with a radio. one of those people who won't admit they are wrong and are wrong constantly and his own stupid personal definitions for everything. Hey pipa, try to find a game you dont feel the need to constantly complain about. You obviously don't understand what EVE is supposed to be.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 16:07:00 - [2] - Quote Pipa Porto wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: why does anyone bother to argue with pipa porto? Its like arguing with a radio. one of those people who won't admit they are wrong and are wrong constantly and his own stupid personal definitions for everything. Hey pipa, try to find a game you dont feel the need to constantly complain about. You obviously don't understand what EVE is supposed to be. EVE is supposed to be only what I say it should be. Kristoffer Touborg/CCP Soundwave wrote: It isnGÇÖt really hard, but I think there are customers that you can lose in a good way and thereGÇÖs customers that you can lose in a bad way. If people come in and fundamentally donGÇÖt like EVE Online, then I think that might be a good way of losing customers. EVE isnGÇÖt for everyone. I wish it was, but the reality is that there are some people who just enjoy playing another game more. And thatGÇÖs not really that bad. http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/06/27/eve-devs-our-game-is-the-mmo-equivalent-of-running-inferno-solo-with-a-naked-barbarian/ EVE is supposed to be a lot of things, you narrow minded derp. And while you were selectively choosing only those defintions that fit your argument and ignoring common sense, you forget a key component that EVE has ALWAYS been billed as: a SANDBOX, a game that is supposed to allows MULTIPLE PLAY STYLES. EVE is obviously not a dark and harsh world for everyone, and it couldn't survive if it was. High sec is high sec for a reason, kid. EVE is mostly carebears and **** pvpers who suck at other pvp games. Its not a game where the sheep are supposed to line up for the brainless wolves that play EVE like you want it to be. Now that CCP is finally fixing the game, all the brainless fools are afraid to lose the only form of "pvp" in which they can actually get kills, if you can even call miner ganking pvp. Only the awful high-sec pvpers are crying. Way to be that endlessly arguing fool who never realizes when hes wrong. Really, those quotes you gave more accurately describe a game like Darkfall than EVE. Why don't you take Soundwaves advice and try to find a game you don't feel the need to constantly cry about. Its moronic to think that aggressors should have all the advantages in EVE. Now get back to your basement!
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:00:00 - [3] - Quote Benny Ohu wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: EVE is a SANDBOX which is why I support removing emergent gameplay when emergent game play becomes game breaking, then it needs fixing. Its a simple concept and it happens in many games. I know all the losers with nothing better to do with their money after having dedicated so much time to EVE just LOVE any opportunity to "pvp" with essentially zero risk, but to the rest of us who actually like good gameplay and risk vs reward, this is exactly why EVE is considered to be such a joke within the pvp gamer community.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:18:00 - [4] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: when emergent game play becomes game breaking, then it needs fixing. So fix it. Come back at us with in-game actions that make us react, rather than the same, tired whining that we see every single day on the forum. It seems to be all some people know how to do, aside from AFK mining. the thing about EVE, its one of those games where ppl aren't supposed to be able to ** with you without any risk. I know that concept is difficult to understand for a lot of EVE denizens, given all the stupid mechanics that have existed for so long that **** players have come to rely on. sad that so many low-lifes like pipa porto actually try and defend it all day long. If you are going to have a high-sec, why do it half-assed? Why don't you high-sec "pvpers" find a game that is actually has no safety zones and see how well you do without concord protecting your cowardly self. If I want a fix for a player skill based, full loot pvp game with excellent clanwarfare, I play Darkfall.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:23:00 - [5] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: when emergent game play becomes game breaking, then it needs fixing. So fix it. Come back at us with in-game actions that make us react, rather than the same, tired whining that we see every single day on the forum. It seems to be all some people know how to do, aside from AFK mining. the thing about EVE, its one of those games where ppl aren't supposed to be able to ** with you without any risk. I know that concept is difficult to understand, given all the stupid mechanics that have existed for so long that ** players have come to rely on. sad that so many low-lifes like pipa porto actually try and defend it all day long. You talk about players relying on "stupid" mechanics, but you seem to be relying on CCP to solve your "problem". So, how about we try again? You have something you deem to be a problem arising from players using in-game and EULA-compliant methods. Why don't you quit your whining and do something about it in-game? I actually don't have a problem with it, I just realize its a stupid mechanic where you can act as an agressor and ** with people with zero risk. It is unbelievable to me that anyone would even bother to do it. It really goes to show you how no-life some of these EVE players are.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:24:00 - [6] - Quote Some Rando wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: the thing about EVE, its one of those games where ppl aren't supposed to be able to **** with you without any risk. Other players provide that risk. If you don't understand that, you don't understand EVE. Or you're just a terrible troll. not in high-sec, derp. Try again. Crimewatch is fixing this joke of a pvp game.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:28:00 - [7] - Quote Some Rando wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: I actually don't have a problem with it Has a problem with it, claims he doesn't have a problem with it. I should clarify, I don't have a personal problem with it in-game. technically you are right, its a stupid mechanic. Any mechanic that allows you to ** with people while under the protection of the police is totally stupid and lame. A joke. Why do you care if someone makes money afk? There are loads of doing it in other ways. The difference is, you are unable to ** with those people while they are doing it. You jokers will take anything you can get. Grow a sack and don't complain when this dumb thing gets changed.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:34:00 - [8] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: I actually don't have a problem with it, I just realize its a stupid mechanic where you can act as an agressor and **** with people with zero risk. It is unbelievable to me that anyone would even bother to do it. It really goes to show you how no-life some of these EVE players are. It wasn't zero risk when some aggrieved miner came at me with a suicide maller the other day. Lucky for me, he's worse at fitting ships than I am. Another agent was attacked viciously with a talos a short while later. It sounds to me like you just have a problem with people interacting and having fun in a multiplayer game, which, by the way, some miners get as much enjoyment out of as bumpers - there are some great sports among them. So I guess we are all supposed to have have suicide mallers at our disposal just because some shitwits are afraid of real pvp. high-sec "pvp" is part of why this game is considered to be such a joke.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:39:00 - [9] - Quote admiral root wrote: Having dispelled your myth about zero-risk you're now moving the goalposts and demanding that the current risk level be raised? Ok, how about you come be part of the risk? Do something, other than forum whining, please. hah, youre argument was a joke. Do you really expect everyone to pack around suicide gank ships with them all the time just to deal with the some random cowards who are afraid of real pvp? anyone can be suicide ganked at any time in high-sec space. It doesn't matter what you are doing.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:50:00 - [10] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: admiral root wrote: Having dispelled your myth about zero-risk you're now moving the goalposts and demanding that the current risk level be raised? Ok, how about you come be part of the risk? Do something, other than forum whining, please. hah, youre argument was a joke. Do you really expect everyone to have suicide gank ships just to deal with some cowards who are afraid of real pvp? So, just to clarify, you're full of hot air and have no interest in being part of the solution to your perceived problem? Got it. Who's next? funny that you claim to have won the argument while trying to defend your ability to annoy people with essentially zero risk. If you weren't an awful player you would have been able to escape from that maller easily. I know your type. A cowardly "pvper" who thinks they should be able to annoy people while under the protection of the police. Pathetic. unfortunate for you that dumb mechanics like t his are obviously going to get fixed. Complaining about dumb mechanics is only natural. Deal with it and stop crying about ppl complaining about dumb mechanics that obviously need fixing.

Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 17:57:00 - [11] - Quote Some Rando wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: funny that you claim to have won the argument while trying to defend your ability to annoy people with essentially zero risk. If you weren't an awful player you would have been able to escape from that maller easily. I know your type. A cowardly "pvper" who somehow thinks you are entitled to annoy people while under the protection of the police. Pathetic. unfortunate for you that dumb mechanics like t his are obviously going to get fixed. Complaining about dumb mechanics is only natural. Deal with it and stop crying about ppl complaining about dumb mechanics that obviously need fixing. 1/10 Also, you still haven't told me how CW 2 is going to fix this game or, for that matter, help people stop bumpers. cimewatch, and i'm sure CCP will eventually figure out something to deal with the cowards who have the ability annoy others without any real risk of loss to themselves in high-sec.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:00:00 - [12] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: I would love to know how fabulous rod thinks crimewatch 2 is going to affect hisec PvP, yes it'll mean that people with a suspect flag can get shot at, bounties will be able to be placed on people etc, here's the kickers. Bumping will not raise a suspect flag. Unless you have kill rights, or have purchased kill rights you won't be able to collect on bounties without concord kicking you into touch, usually at the end of an infinipoint, infiniweb, infinineut and instapwnage dps. The bumpers take the same risk as everyone else in hisec everytime they undock, there's a cottage industry built around suicide ganking them. Bumping is not a zero risk activity, afk mining isn't these days either. It's a sandbox, you can build a castle and then some obnoxious undesirable belligerent bastard can come and knock it down, deal with it. wow, you are a smart one. lol.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:05:00 - [13] - Quote admiral root wrote: Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere. oh, i am doing something. These discussions are what prompts change within the game. Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch. It should be common sense that I win by default.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:13:00 - [14] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: oh, i am doing something. Yes, you're whining. Fabulous Rod wrote: These discussions are what prompts change within the game. This isn't a discussion, it's a one-sided slaughter of whiners, like you. Fabulous Rod wrote: Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch. Actually, you've proven nothing, other than your inability to provide any substantive argument proving the existance of your mythical "problem" and your absolute unwillingness to fire up your game client and become the solution. Fabulous Rod wrote: It should be common sense that I win by default. You're the last person who should be talking about common sense given that you appear to have none. no logic behind those arguments. I guess I win.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:20:00 - [15] - Quote Zak Fey wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: admiral root wrote: Also, thank-you for clarifying that you're happy to whine, but not to actually do anything. You, sir, are a credit to AFK miners everywhere. oh, i am doing something. These discussions are what prompts change within the game. Right now I'm proving your ridiculous arguments invalid. You think you should be able to annoy people in high sec under the protection of crimewatch. It should be common sense that I win by default. You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on. I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:20:00 - [16] - Quote Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. thank you, voice of reason.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:29:00 - [17] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator. Fabulous Rod wrote: Zak Fey wrote: You clearly haven't read the dev blogs. Most of the changes are for can flipping, neutral logistics and kill rights. Nothing of which will effect bumpers at all. This isn't going to be a blanket of safety for high sec, thinking so will just dissappoint you later on. I understand all that. You made some foolish assumptions. Foolish assumptions? please explain the errors in our interpretation of the published Dev blogs. haha, such a derpish argument. There are plenty of AFK activities that will earn you isk in EVE,planetary interaction, research and datacores just to name a few. Its part of the game, just the only part you cowardly scrubs are able to **** with. I guess CCP just didn't foresee that people would actually dedicate their time to annoying people to such an extent. I certainly didn't. Just goes to show you what pathetic losers so many EVE denizens really are.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:33:00 - [18] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. AFK mining is a way that someone discovered as a method of printing ISK while not actually playing the game, it griefs other miners without concord interference by devaluing their labours and time to the lowest common denominator I agree. I salute you sir, you can see both sides of the argument, bumping is taking advantage of aggression mechanics but at the same time AFK mining is taking advantage of the cycle times and the recent EHP buff of the vessels used to do it, the latter of which made it considerably more difficult to pop mining barges, bumping is a reaction to the buff. it "griefs other miners" lol maybe even a derp like you can admit that is a bit of a stretch, hmm?
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:38:00 - [19] - Quote Smohq Anmirorz wrote: admiral root wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Griefing is bannable, and quite rightly so. You should petition griefers without hesitation and let the GMs take care of business. Sadly, for you, we are not griefing. Everything the new order does complies with the EULA. As for cowardly, no, it's just people adapting and reacting to changes made by CCP. The real cowards are the miners, like Jacob Amaris, who whines like a little girl in local pleading for someone else to kill us, but who wouldn't dream of turning off his mining lasers long enough to do it himself. It's an isk per hour thing, you see? Better to leave that barge AFK mining and come to the forum to whine to the devs. I might also add that it's fun! Many of our "victims" have a damn good time with us in their system, sharing laughs and great conversation, while they tediously chip away at that ice cube in the hope that this cycle will finish the bugger off. It's giving people grief, why would you argue that you're not? The forums clearly indicate the 'keen distress' necessary to use that word. And the fact that miners are cowards doesn't mean bumpers aren't. News flash. They both are. miners aren't necessarily cowards. Do you want to edit that statement? Bumping however is a high-sec only activity. This we know.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:50:00 - [20] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: maybe even a derp like you can admit that is a bit of a stretch, hmm? Nope it's not a stretch at all, I'm a miner & industrialist on another character, I would like to see the value of both my time and the minerals/products I produce increase, AFK miners prevent this by flooding the market with an excess of overly cheap minerals and ice that they sell direct to buy orders. I consider the bumpers as carrying out an economic warfare campaign on behalf of those of us that do actually mine while at the keyboard. you don't know what the definition of griefing is then. Sounds to me like you fail to adapt and are mad about competitive prices so you are willing to support the use of lame game mechanics that only pitiful cowards would engage in.

Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 18:51:00 - [21] - Quote Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: admiral root wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Griefing is bannable, and quite rightly so. You should petition griefers without hesitation and let the GMs take care of business. Sadly, for you, we are not griefing. Everything the new order does complies with the EULA. As for cowardly, no, it's just people adapting and reacting to changes made by CCP. The real cowards are the miners, like Jacob Amaris, who whines like a little girl in local pleading for someone else to kill us, but who wouldn't dream of turning off his mining lasers long enough to do it himself. It's an isk per hour thing, you see? Better to leave that barge AFK mining and come to the forum to whine to the devs. I might also add that it's fun! Many of our "victims" have a damn good time with us in their system, sharing laughs and great conversation, while they tediously chip away at that ice cube in the hope that this cycle will finish the bugger off. It's giving people grief, why would you argue that you're not? The forums clearly indicate the 'keen distress' necessary to use that word. And the fact that miners are cowards doesn't mean bumpers aren't. News flash. They both are. miners aren't necessarily cowards. Do you want to edit that statement? Bumping however is a high-sec only activity. This we know. Context, dude. Are we not talking about high-sec miners in an ice field? I see your point and I still like the statement as I wrote it. and one action is much more cowardly than the other, correct?
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:01:00 - [22] - Quote Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: would please explain to me how miners are cowardly? I just like to make money AFK while doing other **** and I'm STILL taking a much bigger risk than any bumper. I would gladly do so, but I would just be repeating information already given earlier by another poster: "The real cowards are the miners, like Jacob Amaris, who whines like a little girl in local pleading for someone else to kill us, but who wouldn't dream of turning off his mining lasers long enough to do it himself. It's an isk per hour thing, you see? Better to leave that barge AFK mining and come to the forum to whine to the devs." Whining about bumpers while ignoring the problems with AFK mining is rather cowardly. oh, please! PEOPLE are cowards, it has nothing to do with being a miner.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:08:00 - [23] - Quote Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: I see no problems with AFK mining. Wow. I...uhhh.... Wow. OK, I'm done here. Have a nice discussion. i know your view, its a narrow minded one. Why can't mining be a afk activity too? The new mackinaw says it can be. Adapt or die, or cry. Cry about mineral prices? Get competitive.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:19:00 - [24] - Quote Zak Fey wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: I see no problems with AFK mining. Wow. I...uhhh.... Wow. OK, I'm done here. Have a nice discussion. i know your view, its a narrow minded one. Why can't mining be a afk activity too? The new mackinaw says it can be. Adapt or die, or cry. Cry about mineral prices? Get competitive. But really we should also be asking for buffs to the hulk as well. No reason to think in only one direction. Adapt or die, or cry. The bumpers aren't going anywhere. gayme mechanics get removed. I guess we will see, wont we I'm just pointing out the obvious, I've never even had a problem with bumpers personally, really quite dispassionate about this. But its fun with the cowards bringing lame mechanics like this into the light of day. I feel confident and I feel like you bumpers are
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:24:00 - [25] - Quote admiral root wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: I see no problems with AFK mining. Wow. I...uhhh.... Wow. OK, I'm done here. Have a nice discussion. I'm sorry to see him drive you out of the conversation like that - it was nice to briefly interact with you. You're more than welcome to join us for the next bumping party. haha, he crapped all over your stupid arguments and validated me but you'll take anything to try and get at me, won't you? I know the truth must irk you, being called a cowardly high-sec griefer. Deal with it.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:29:00 - [26] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: haha, he crapped all over your stupid arguments and validated me but you'll take anything to try and get at me, won't you? I know the truth must irk you, being called a cowardly high-sec griefer. Deal with it. Actually, you took a potential ally and drove him away. Well played, old chap. actually, I found out he wasn't as smart or as open minded as i thought he was. Its hard to match this though, I got to admit I'm kinda rough on ppl. Sorry for crapping on you all so hard with logical arguments.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:33:00 - [27] - Quote admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: admiral root wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: haha, he crapped all over your stupid arguments and validated me but you'll take anything to try and get at me, won't you? I know the truth must irk you, being called a cowardly high-sec griefer. Deal with it. Actually, you took a potential ally and drove him away. Well played, old chap. actually, I found out he wasn't as smart or as open minded as i thought he was. Its hard to match this though, I got to admit I'm kinda rough on ppl. Sorry for crapping on you all so hard with logical arguments. Ah, the old "anyone who disagrees with me is an idiot" argument. You're really scraping the bottle fo the barrel. i've had enough honors in my life to realize my place. Have you? but w/e this is a stupid conversation now. Can you quit attacking me and start telling me why you think you should be able to annoy people while under the protection of concord?
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:36:00 - [28] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Except it's not griefing. GoonWaffe Ah, how typical. Leave it to a goon to claim the sky is black.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:47:00 - [29] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Bumping however is a high-sec only activity. This we know. You are so wrong about that. its only considered an issue in high-sec. context for the herd-like mind.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:51:00 - [30] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Except it's not griefing. GoonWaffe Ah, how typical. Leave it to a goon to claim the sky is black. Lets do a little fact checking here shall we. Griefing is a bannable offence. Now judging by the amount of petitions against bumpers (many) & the amount of bumpers that have been banned (none), that only leads to one conclusion. Bumping isn't griefing. We all remember the thread where the GM helpfully said to orbit the asteroid. And its tears. Things change you know, not everything a gm says is set in stone. This is a good direction for EVE.

Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 12	Posted - 2012.11.10 19:54:00 - [31] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Bumping however is a high-sec only activity. This we know. You are so wrong about that. its only considered an issue in high-sec. context. Actually, it was pretty clear what you said. I'll quote it again just incase you forgot: Fabulous Rod wrote: Bumping however is a high-sec only activity. This we know. You are also wrong again. People in nullsec who have lost nice stuff have considered it an issue aswell, only to be told it's working as intended. It is clear that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. this thread is about high sec bumping. please use your head or Ill get out my cattle prod.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 13	Posted - 2012.11.10 20:06:00 - [32] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Except it's not griefing. "A griefer is a player in a multiplayer video game who deliberately irritates and harasses other players within the game, using aspects of the game in unintended ways" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griefer Interupt the same player consistently and CCP will indeed step in. Oh dear, people use wikipedia as a source of information. Looks like you got shat on pretty hard by solid logic. Wikipedia is the definition of the world. Whats your credibility for your personal definition? You goons are a riot
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 13	Posted - 2012.11.10 20:09:00 - [33] - Quote admiral root wrote: Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Oh dear, people use wikipedia as a source of information. What are we supposed to use....your brain ? I suppose you could try using your own. he is right though. And it was hilarious.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 13	Posted - 2012.11.10 20:13:00 - [34] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Smohq Anmirorz wrote: Bumping is just a way someone discovered to grief people in high sec without having to kill them and have concord show up. It's cowardly. Except it's not griefing. "A griefer is a player in a multiplayer video game who deliberately irritates and harasses other players within the game, using aspects of the game in unintended ways" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griefer Interupt the same player consistently and CCP will indeed step in. Oh dear, people use wikipedia as a source of information. Orbit the asteroid and the bumper will miss. Remember? oh, right, what the GM said once. The law of the land.
Fabulous Rod Darkfall Corp 13	Posted - 2012.11.10 20:18:00 - [35] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: Fabulous Rod wrote: Looks like you got shat on pretty hard by solid logic. Wikipedia is the definition of the world. Whats your credibility for your personal definition? You goons are a riot If a source of regularly proven incorrect information is your source of logic, then I have something to tell you. hah! wikipedia is wrong sometimes so its always wrong. Great logic there bobo.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.